# 1%Club vs Teaming

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

1%Club héberge les données des donateurs dans l’EEE — un avantage concret pour les campagnes sensibles au RGPD — contrairement à Teaming. Sur les chiffres clés, 1%Club et Teaming se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | 1%Club | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €100.00 | €100.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 0% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 53 | 80 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | EEA | — |
| Langues | 2 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 2 | 0 |

## Choisis 1%Club si

> Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

- Mission-driven focus on social initiatives aligned with the UN Global Goals.
- Personal coaching of campaign initiators rather than a purely self-serve model.
- Bilingual Dutch and English interface.
- Accepts donations in euros and US dollars.


## Choisis Teaming si

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.