# iDonate vs Petje Af

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, iDonate reverse environ €6.00 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que Petje Af (€100.00 contre €94.00). Sur les chiffres clés, iDonate et Petje Af se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | iDonate | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €100.00 | €94.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 6% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 64 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | — | — |
| Langues | 0 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 0 | 0 |

## Choisis iDonate si

> Mid-sized and larger US nonprofits that want conversion-optimised, embeddable donation and recurring-gift tools with enterprise-grade donor-data security, and are comfortable with custom, sales-quoted pricing.

- Conversion-focused giving tools: pop-up forms, hosted donation pages, embeddable website forms, and recurring-gift prompts.
- Enterprise donor-data security with annual SOC 2 Type 2 audits, third-party penetration testing, and a zero-trust design.
- Operates in accordance with GDPR standards per its privacy disclosures.
- Multiple donation rails: credit card, debit card, and ACH bank transfer.


## Choisis Petje Af si

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.