# iDonate vs 1%Club

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

1%Club héberge les données des donateurs dans l’EEE — un avantage concret pour les campagnes sensibles au RGPD — contrairement à iDonate. Sur les chiffres clés, iDonate et 1%Club se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | iDonate | 1%Club |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €100.00 | €100.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 0% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 53 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | — | EEA |
| Langues | 0 | 2 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 0 | 2 |

## Choisis iDonate si

> Mid-sized and larger US nonprofits that want conversion-optimised, embeddable donation and recurring-gift tools with enterprise-grade donor-data security, and are comfortable with custom, sales-quoted pricing.

- Conversion-focused giving tools: pop-up forms, hosted donation pages, embeddable website forms, and recurring-gift prompts.
- Enterprise donor-data security with annual SOC 2 Type 2 audits, third-party penetration testing, and a zero-trust design.
- Operates in accordance with GDPR standards per its privacy disclosures.
- Multiple donation rails: credit card, debit card, and ACH bank transfer.


## Choisis 1%Club si

> Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

- Mission-driven focus on social initiatives aligned with the UN Global Goals.
- Personal coaching of campaign initiators rather than a purely self-serve model.
- Bilingual Dutch and English interface.
- Accepts donations in euros and US dollars.