# GlobalGiving vs PIFworld

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, PIFworld reverse environ €1.60 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que GlobalGiving (€93.60 contre €92.00). Sur les chiffres clés, GlobalGiving et PIFworld se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | GlobalGiving | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €92.00 | €93.60 |
| Frais de plateforme | 5% | 6.05% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 3% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 84 | 56 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 1 |
| Hébergement des données | US | — |
| Langues | 1 | 2 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 11 | 0 |

## Choisis GlobalGiving si

> Donors and companies wanting to give to vetted grassroots nonprofits worldwide, and smaller international NGOs seeking a due-diligence stamp and access to US donors and corporate giving programs.

- Rigorous due-diligence vetting of every nonprofit, a strong trust signal for donors.
- Global reach connecting donors and companies with grassroots nonprofits worldwide.
- Established track record since 2002 with more than a million donors.
- Corporate-giving and disaster-relief programs beyond individual donations.


## Choisis PIFworld si

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.

