# Funraisin vs PIFworld

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

Sur les chiffres clés, Funraisin et PIFworld se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Funraisin | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €100.00 | €93.60 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 6.05% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 78 | 56 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 1 |
| Hébergement des données | AU/EU/NA | — |
| Langues | 1 | 2 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 7 | 0 |

## Choisis Funraisin si

> Established nonprofits and charities running event-based, peer-to-peer, and recurring fundraising programmes that want a fully branded, white-label platform and have the capacity to operate it.

- White-label, highly customisable platform that lets nonprofits run fully branded fundraising sites.
- Broad feature suite: donations, peer-to-peer, events and ticketing, raffles, recurring giving, and a built-in CMS.
- Wide payment coverage including cards, PayPal, Apple Pay and Google Pay via Stripe, iDEAL, ACH, and BECS direct debit.
- Multilingual deployments via optional language packs and support for a wide range of currencies.


## Choisis PIFworld si

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.