# Funraise vs Petje Af

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Petje Af reverse environ €2.50 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que Funraise (€94.00 contre €91.50). Sur les chiffres clés, Funraise et Petje Af se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Funraise | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €91.50 | €94.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 5% | 6% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 2.9% + €0.60 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 63 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | US | — |
| Langues | 0 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 5 | 0 |

## Choisis Funraise si

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.


## Choisis Petje Af si

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.