# FundRazr vs Teaming

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Teaming reverse environ €3.20 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que FundRazr (€100.00 contre €96.80). Sur les chiffres clés, FundRazr et Teaming se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | FundRazr | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €96.80 | €100.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 0% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 2.9% + €0.30 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 80 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | Canada and US | — |
| Langues | 1 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 4 | 0 |

## Choisis FundRazr si

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choisis Teaming si

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.