# FundRazr vs PIFworld

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, FundRazr reverse environ €3.20 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que PIFworld (€96.80 contre €93.60). Sur les chiffres clés, FundRazr et PIFworld se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | FundRazr | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €96.80 | €93.60 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 6.05% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 2.9% + €0.30 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 56 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 1 |
| Hébergement des données | Canada and US | — |
| Langues | 1 | 2 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 4 | 0 |

## Choisis FundRazr si

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choisis PIFworld si

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.