# FundRazr vs Petje Af

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, FundRazr reverse environ €2.80 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que Petje Af (€96.80 contre €94.00). Sur les chiffres clés, FundRazr et Petje Af se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | FundRazr | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €96.80 | €94.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 6% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 2.9% + €0.30 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 63 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | Canada and US | — |
| Langues | 1 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 4 | 0 |

## Choisis FundRazr si

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choisis Petje Af si

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.