# Enthuse vs Petje Af

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Enthuse reverse environ €1.00 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que Petje Af (€95.00 contre €94.00). Enthuse héberge les données des donateurs dans l’EEE — un avantage concret pour les campagnes sensibles au RGPD — contrairement à Petje Af.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Enthuse | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €95.00 | €94.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 5% | 6% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 4.6 (410) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 4.9 | 64 |
| Couverture géographique | 1 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | UK/EEA | — |
| Langues | 1 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 1 | 0 |

## Choisis Enthuse si

> UK and Irish registered charities that want fully branded donation pages, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event registration consolidated on one platform under their own identity.

- White-label donation, fundraising, and event-registration pages presented under the charity's own brand.
- Combines online donations, peer-to-peer fundraising, and event ticketing in a single platform.
- Registered with the UK Financial Conduct Authority as a Small Payment Institution (firm reference 797344).
- Payments processed through established providers Stripe, GoCardless, and PayPal.


## Choisis Petje Af si

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.