# Doneerveilig vs PIFworld

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, PIFworld reverse environ €1.26 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que Doneerveilig (€93.60 contre €92.34). Sur les chiffres clés, Doneerveilig et PIFworld se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Doneerveilig | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €92.34 | €93.60 |
| Frais de plateforme | 6.7% | 6.05% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (44) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 23 | 56 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 1 |
| Hébergement des données | — | — |
| Langues | 1 | 2 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 2 | 0 |

## Choisis Doneerveilig si

> Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

- Security-focused framing: PSD2 compliance supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, escrow handling, and SSL.
- Donations held on a third-party escrow account (derdengeldenrekening) before payout.
- Quick, simple campaign setup aimed at individual causes.
- Account verification via a one-cent micro-transfer.


## Choisis PIFworld si

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.