# Doneerveilig vs Petje Af

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Petje Af reverse environ €1.66 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que Doneerveilig (€94.00 contre €92.34). Sur les chiffres clés, Doneerveilig et Petje Af se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Doneerveilig | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €92.34 | €94.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 6.7% | 6% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (44) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 24 | 63 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | — | — |
| Langues | 1 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 2 | 0 |

## Choisis Doneerveilig si

> Dutch and Belgian individuals running personal fundraising campaigns who prioritise a security-focused, PSD2-compliant platform with escrow handling and a simple, quick setup.

- Security-focused framing: PSD2 compliance supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, escrow handling, and SSL.
- Donations held on a third-party escrow account (derdengeldenrekening) before payout.
- Quick, simple campaign setup aimed at individual causes.
- Account verification via a one-cent micro-transfer.


## Choisis Petje Af si

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.