# Doare vs Teaming

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Teaming reverse environ €6.25 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que Doare (€100.00 contre €93.75). Sur les chiffres clés, Doare et Teaming se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Doare | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €93.75 | €100.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 0% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 5.8% + €0.45 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 80 |
| Couverture géographique | 1 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | — | — |
| Langues | 3 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 8 | 0 |

## Choisis Doare si

> Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

- Purpose-built nonprofit toolkit: donation pages, recurring giving, and donor CRM.
- Supports Brazilian rails including boleto and PIX, plus automatic recurring PIX.
- Tiered plans with per-transaction costs that decrease at higher tiers.
- Peer-to-peer ambassador fundraising and corporate ESG and matching products.


## Choisis Teaming si

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.