# Doare vs Petje Af

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

Sur les chiffres clés, Doare et Petje Af se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Doare | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €93.75 | €94.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 6% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 5.8% + €0.45 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 64 |
| Couverture géographique | 1 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | — | — |
| Langues | 3 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 8 | 0 |

## Choisis Doare si

> Brazilian nonprofits and third-sector organizations that want hosted donation pages, recurring-giving tools, and a donor CRM to build a sustained local donor base, rather than a one-off campaign.

- Purpose-built nonprofit toolkit: donation pages, recurring giving, and donor CRM.
- Supports Brazilian rails including boleto and PIX, plus automatic recurring PIX.
- Tiered plans with per-transaction costs that decrease at higher tiers.
- Peer-to-peer ambassador fundraising and corporate ESG and matching products.


## Choisis Petje Af si

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.