# Big Give vs PIFworld

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Big Give reverse environ 6.40 de plus au bénéficiaire pour 100 donnés que PIFworld (£100.00 contre €93.60 pour 100). Sur les chiffres clés, Big Give et PIFworld se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Big Give | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | £100.00 | €93.60 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 6.05% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 56 |
| Couverture géographique | 1 | 1 |
| Hébergement des données | UK | — |
| Langues | 1 | 2 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 4 | 0 |

## Choisis Big Give si

> UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

- Match-funding model can effectively double donations during a campaign.
- Operated by a registered UK charity, aligned with the sector it serves.
- Well-established, with the flagship Christmas Challenge running since 2008.
- Connects charities with major donors and Champion funders who provide match funding.


## Choisis PIFworld si

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.