# Big Give vs Petje Af

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Big Give reverse environ 6.00 de plus au bénéficiaire pour 100 donnés que Petje Af (£100.00 contre €94.00 pour 100). Sur les chiffres clés, Big Give et Petje Af se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Big Give | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | £100.00 | €94.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 6% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 63 |
| Couverture géographique | 1 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | UK | — |
| Langues | 1 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 4 | 0 |

## Choisis Big Give si

> UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

- Match-funding model can effectively double donations during a campaign.
- Operated by a registered UK charity, aligned with the sector it serves.
- Well-established, with the flagship Christmas Challenge running since 2008.
- Connects charities with major donors and Champion funders who provide match funding.


## Choisis Petje Af si

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.