# Big Give vs Funraise

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Big Give reverse environ 8.50 de plus au bénéficiaire pour 100 donnés que Funraise (£100.00 contre €91.50 pour 100). Sur les chiffres clés, Big Give et Funraise se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | Big Give | Funraise |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | £100.00 | €91.50 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 5% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 0% + £0.00 | 2.9% + €0.60 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 79 |
| Couverture géographique | 1 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | UK | US |
| Langues | 1 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 4 | 5 |

## Choisis Big Give si

> UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

- Match-funding model can effectively double donations during a campaign.
- Operated by a registered UK charity, aligned with the sector it serves.
- Well-established, with the flagship Christmas Challenge running since 2008.
- Connects charities with major donors and Champion funders who provide match funding.


## Choisis Funraise si

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.