# BetterWorld vs Petje Af

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, BetterWorld reverse environ €2.80 de plus au bénéficiaire pour €100 donnés que Petje Af (€96.80 contre €94.00). Sur les chiffres clés, BetterWorld et Petje Af se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | BetterWorld | Petje Af |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €96.80 | €94.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 6% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 2.9% + €0.30 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 64 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 0 |
| Hébergement des données | — | — |
| Langues | 1 | 0 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 5 | 0 |

## Choisis BetterWorld si

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Choisis Petje Af si

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.