# BetterWorld vs Big Give

## Ce que disent les chiffres.

En payant par Credit card, Big Give reverse environ 3.20 de plus au bénéficiaire pour 100 donnés que BetterWorld (£100.00 contre €96.80 pour 100). Sur les chiffres clés, BetterWorld et Big Give se valent — le meilleur choix dépend de la disponibilité de Credit card, de la couverture linguistique et de la localisation de tes donateurs.

## Côte à côte.

| Critère | BetterWorld | Big Give |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Le bénéficiaire reçoit | €96.80 | £100.00 |
| Frais de plateforme | 0% | 0% |
| Frais de traitement des paiements | 2.9% + €0.30 | 0% + £0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 77 |
| Couverture géographique | 0 | 1 |
| Hébergement des données | — | UK |
| Langues | 1 | 1 |
| Moyens de paiement pris en charge | 5 | 4 |

## Choisis BetterWorld si

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Choisis Big Give si

> UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

- Match-funding model can effectively double donations during a campaign.
- Operated by a registered UK charity, aligned with the sector it serves.
- Well-established, with the flagship Christmas Challenge running since 2008.
- Connects charities with major donors and Champion funders who provide match funding.