# BuonaCausa vs iHelp

## Mitä luvut kertovat.

Päälukujen valossa BuonaCausa ja iHelp ovat hyvin tasaväkisiä — parempi valinta riippuu MobilePay-tuesta, kielivalikoimasta ja siitä, missä lahjoittajasi ovat.

## Rinnakkain.

| Mittari | BuonaCausa | iHelp |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Saaja saa | €100.00 | €100.00 |
| Alustamaksu | 0% | 0% |
| Maksunkäsittelymaksu | 0% + €0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 60 | 50 |
| Maakattavuus | 1 | 1 |
| Tietojen sijainti | EU | EU |
| Kielet | 1 | 2 |
| Tuetut maksutavat | 4 | 1 |

## Valitse BuonaCausa, jos

> Italian associations, nonprofits, and individuals who want a no-commission way to collect donations directly into their own accounts, and campaigners who pair fundraising with online petitions and activism.

- Donations are paid directly into the organiser's own bank, PayPal, or postal account without platform intermediation
- No platform commission charged on donations
- Reduced third-party processing costs for recognised nonprofit (ONLUS) organisations
- Combines donation fundraising with online petitions and activism on one platform


## Valitse iHelp, jos

> Spanish nonprofits and donors who value vetted, legitimacy-checked causes and a commission-light giving model, and who are comfortable with a single Santander payment gateway and a smaller catalogue of campaigns.

- No platform commission charged to nonprofits or donors, per iHelp's FAQ.
- NGOs and causes are vetted for legality and viability before listing.
- Long heritage in Spanish online giving, continuing Cibersolidaridad.org which ran from 2001.
- Post-donation follow-up and a stated focus on transparent, effective altruism.