# Charitable Impact vs 1%Club

## Lo que dicen los datos.

1%Club guarda los datos de los donantes dentro del EEE — una ventaja práctica para campañas sensibles al RGPD — mientras que Charitable Impact no. En las cifras clave, Charitable Impact y 1%Club están muy igualados — la mejor opción depende de la disponibilidad de Credit card, la cobertura de idiomas y dónde estén tus donantes.

## En paralelo.

| Dato | Charitable Impact | 1%Club |
| --- | --- | --- |
| El beneficiario recibe | C$97.20 | €100.00 |
| Comisión de plataforma | 0% | 0% |
| Comisión de procesamiento de pago | 2.8% + C$0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 71 | 53 |
| Cobertura por países | 1 | 0 |
| Residencia de datos | — | EEA |
| Idiomas | 1 | 2 |
| Métodos de pago admitidos | 5 | 2 |

## Elige Charitable Impact si

> Canadian individuals and families who want a single donor-advised Impact Account to organize their giving, support friends' causes, and receive a tax receipt for every contribution they add.

- Operates as a donor-advised fund: donors add money to an Impact Account and recommend gifts to charities over time.
- A tax receipt is issued for the full amount added to the Impact Account, regardless of when it is granted to charities.
- Accepts a wide range of assets, including cash, securities, real estate, and cryptocurrency.
- Peer-to-peer giving, Giving Groups, and campaigns let donors pool and direct money together.


## Elige 1%Club si

> Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

- Mission-driven focus on social initiatives aligned with the UN Global Goals.
- Personal coaching of campaign initiators rather than a purely self-serve model.
- Bilingual Dutch and English interface.
- Accepts donations in euros and US dollars.