# Big Give vs Teaming

## Lo que dicen los datos.

En las cifras clave, Big Give y Teaming están muy igualados — la mejor opción depende de la disponibilidad de Credit card, la cobertura de idiomas y dónde estén tus donantes.

## En paralelo.

| Dato | Big Give | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| El beneficiario recibe | £100.00 | €100.00 |
| Comisión de plataforma | 0% | 0% |
| Comisión de procesamiento de pago | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 80 |
| Cobertura por países | 1 | 0 |
| Residencia de datos | UK | — |
| Idiomas | 1 | 0 |
| Métodos de pago admitidos | 4 | 0 |

## Elige Big Give si

> UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

- Match-funding model can effectively double donations during a campaign.
- Operated by a registered UK charity, aligned with the sector it serves.
- Well-established, with the flagship Christmas Challenge running since 2008.
- Connects charities with major donors and Champion funders who provide match funding.


## Elige Teaming si

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.