# BetterWorld vs 1%Club

## Lo que dicen los datos.

1%Club guarda los datos de los donantes dentro del EEE — una ventaja práctica para campañas sensibles al RGPD — mientras que BetterWorld no. En las cifras clave, BetterWorld y 1%Club están muy igualados — la mejor opción depende de la disponibilidad de Credit card, la cobertura de idiomas y dónde estén tus donantes.

## En paralelo.

| Dato | BetterWorld | 1%Club |
| --- | --- | --- |
| El beneficiario recibe | €96.80 | €100.00 |
| Comisión de plataforma | 0% | 0% |
| Comisión de procesamiento de pago | 2.9% + €0.30 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 53 |
| Cobertura por países | 0 | 0 |
| Residencia de datos | — | EEA |
| Idiomas | 1 | 2 |
| Métodos de pago admitidos | 5 | 2 |

## Elige BetterWorld si

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Elige 1%Club si

> Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

- Mission-driven focus on social initiatives aligned with the UN Global Goals.
- Personal coaching of campaign initiators rather than a purely self-serve model.
- Bilingual Dutch and English interface.
- Accepts donations in euros and US dollars.

