# Raisely vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about kr1.70 more of every kr100 donated than Raisely (kr100.00 vs kr98.30). On the headline numbers, Raisely and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Raisely | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | kr98.30 | kr100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.4% + kr0.30 | 0% + kr0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 82 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 8 | 0 |
| Data residency | AU/UK/US | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 0 |

## Choose Raisely if

> Australian, UK and North American charities and nonprofits that want fully customizable, white-label peer-to-peer and recurring-giving campaigns, full ownership of their donor data and no lock-in contracts.

- Fully customizable, white-label donation pages and campaign websites built without code.
- Strong peer-to-peer, team-fundraising and recurring-giving tooling.
- Donor-data ownership with CRM integrations, automation and a developer API, with no lock-in contracts.
- Funded by optional donor tips rather than a mandatory subscription, with an optional paid plan.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.