# Petje Af vs Supp.to

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about kr5.51 more of every kr100 donated than Petje Af (kr99.51 vs kr94.00). On the headline numbers, Petje Af and Supp.to are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Petje Af | Supp.to |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | kr94.00 | kr99.51 |
| Platform fee | 6% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 0% + kr0.00 | 0% + kr0.49 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 64 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 2 |
| Data residency | — | NL |
| Languages | 0 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 0 | 17 |

## Choose Petje Af if

> Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

- Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
- Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
- No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
- Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.


## Choose Supp.to if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

- Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
- No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
- Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
- Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.