# Givelify vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about kr3.20 more of every kr100 donated than Givelify (kr100.00 vs kr96.80). On the headline numbers, Givelify and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Givelify | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | kr96.80 | kr100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + kr0.30 | 0% + kr0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 86 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 0 |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | 0 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 0 |

## Choose Givelify if

> US churches, places of worship, and faith-based nonprofits that want a polished mobile giving app and simple donation pages with donor analytics, rather than complex campaign tooling.

- Highly rated, widely downloaded donor app that lowers friction for mobile and repeat giving.
- Online donation pages, text-to-give, and QR giving alongside the app.
- Donor management and analytics with a dedicated giving-success coach.
- Accepts major card brands: Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and American Express.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.