# Funraise vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about kr8.50 more of every kr100 donated than Funraise (kr100.00 vs kr91.50). On the headline numbers, Funraise and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | Funraise | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | kr91.50 | kr100.00 |
| Platform fee | 5% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + kr0.60 | 0% + kr0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 0 |
| Data residency | US | — |
| Languages | 0 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 5 | 0 |

## Choose Funraise if

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.