# FundRazr vs Yapla

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, FundRazr delivers about kr1.00 more of every kr100 donated than Yapla (kr96.80 vs kr95.80). On the headline numbers, FundRazr and Yapla are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | FundRazr | Yapla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | kr96.80 | kr95.80 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + kr0.30 | 3.9% + kr0.30 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | 2.3 (6) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 81 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 5 |
| Data residency | Canada and US | Canada or EU (by org region) |
| Languages | 1 | 3 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 4 |

## Choose FundRazr if

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choose Yapla if

> Nonprofits, clubs, and associations in Canada and parts of Europe that want to run donations and fundraising inside a single tool alongside memberships, events, accounting, and contact management.

- All-in-one suite combining donations and crowdfunding with memberships, events, accounting, newsletters, and a CRM.
- Available in both French and English, with users in Canada and parts of Europe.
- Accepts a wide range of payment methods: credit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, cheque, cash, and bank transfer.
- Offers an optional donor-contribution model that can cover the cost of payment processing.