# FundRazr vs Teaming

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Teaming delivers about kr3.20 more of every kr100 donated than FundRazr (kr100.00 vs kr96.80). On the headline numbers, FundRazr and Teaming are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | FundRazr | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | kr96.80 | kr100.00 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 2.9% + kr0.30 | 0% + kr0.00 |
| Trustpilot | 3.3 (214) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 80 |
| Country coverage | 0 | 0 |
| Data residency | Canada and US | — |
| Languages | 1 | 0 |
| Payment methods supported | 4 | 0 |

## Choose FundRazr if

> North American nonprofits and individual fundraisers who want a flexible, long-established platform supporting donation campaigns, peer-to-peer events, and recurring giving with a tip-based pricing option.

- Long-established platform operating since 2010 with a large campaign track record
- Two pricing options: a donor-tip-funded plan or a platform-percentage plan
- Supports donations, peer-to-peer events, perks, and recurring giving
- Choice of keep-it-all or all-or-nothing campaign structures


## Choose Teaming if

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.