# CotizUp vs Supp.to

## What the data says.

Paying by Credit card, Supp.to delivers about kr1.91 more of every kr100 donated than CotizUp (kr99.51 vs kr97.60). On the headline numbers, CotizUp and Supp.to are closely matched — the better pick comes down to Credit card availability, language coverage, and where your donors are.

## Side-by-side.

| Metric | CotizUp | Supp.to |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient gets | kr97.60 | kr99.51 |
| Platform fee | 0% | 0% |
| Payment processing fee | 1.9% + kr0.50 | 0% + kr0.49 |
| Trustpilot | 4.2 (2713) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 72 | 56 |
| Country coverage | 1 | 2 |
| Data residency | — | NL |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Payment methods supported | 1 | 17 |

## Choose CotizUp if

> French individuals and groups raising money for personal causes, projects, or collective gifts who want a simple cagnotte with no platform commission and a keep-it-all model.

- No platform commission, so organisers keep what they raise (keep-it-all model)
- Simple cagnotte format designed for quick, shareable group collections
- Optional donor tip is fully voluntary and can be adjusted or removed before paying
- Card and bank processing charges are passed through at cost rather than marked up


## Choose Supp.to if

> Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

- Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
- No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
- Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
- Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.