givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Petje Af vs Teaming

Petje Af logo
Petje Af
— · 0 countries

Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

On a £100 donation, Teaming delivers £6.00 more to the recipient than Petje Af.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Petje Af Teaming
Recipient gets (£100) £94.00 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 6% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + £0.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 3 (9)★ winner
Country coverage 0 countries 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 0 0
Payment methods supported 0 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

£100.00 vs £94.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Teaming

— vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

0 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Petje Af if

Dutch-speaking content creators — podcasters, educators, journalists, and niche communities — who want recurring membership and donation income while keeping ownership of their audience and payment data.

  • Supports both recurring memberships and one-off donations in one platform.
  • Creators retain ownership of payments, content, and customer data.
  • No lock-in contract; creators pay only when they earn.
  • Each creator connects their own Mollie or Stripe payment account.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Petje Af or Teaming?

On a £100 donation, Petje Af delivers approximately £94.00 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Petje Af operates in 0 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →