givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-03 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

OnParticipe vs Voor je Buurt

OnParticipe logo
OnParticipe
France · 1 countries

French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

Voor je Buurt logo
Voor je Buurt
EEA · 1 countries

Dutch community groups, volunteers, and local initiatives raising money for civic, social, or green neighbourhood projects, especially those that can pair public donations with matchfunding from municipalities, provinces, or foundations.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, OnParticipe delivers 5.00 more per 100 to the recipient than Voor je Buurt.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: OnParticipe in EUR, Voor je Buurt in GBP.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric OnParticipe Voor je Buurt
Recipient gets (per 100) €100.00★ winner £95.00
Platform fee 0%★ winner 5%
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00★ winner 0% + £0.00
Trustpilot 3 (21)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency France EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 1★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
OnParticipe

€100.00 vs £95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
OnParticipe

3 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Voor je Buurt

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose OnParticipe if

French and European organisers running cagnottes, ticketed events, or association fundraising who want a no-commission, French-hosted platform with identity controls, and who will read the terms for inactivity and refund charges.

  • No commission on collections, so organisers keep the entire amount raised and ticket revenue.
  • Designed and hosted in France, with French customer support available seven days a week.
  • Funded by an optional donor tip rather than a mandatory platform charge.
  • Systematic identity-document checks on organisers for fraud control.
Read full review →
Choose Voor je Buurt if

Dutch community groups, volunteers, and local initiatives raising money for civic, social, or green neighbourhood projects, especially those that can pair public donations with matchfunding from municipalities, provinces, or foundations.

  • Specialises in civic, social, and green neighbourhood projects across the Netherlands.
  • A single 5% service fee on payout that already covers the payment provider's transaction costs.
  • Matchfunding partnerships with funds and local governments (VSBfonds, RegioBank, provinces, and municipalities) can multiply what a campaign raises.
  • Long operating track record, with thousands of completed campaigns and a high reported success rate.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, OnParticipe or Voor je Buurt?

Of every 100 donated, OnParticipe delivers approximately €100.00 to the recipient and Voor je Buurt delivers approximately £95.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Voor je Buurt is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

OnParticipe operates in 1 countries; Voor je Buurt operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →