givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Migranodearena vs Teaming

Migranodearena logo
Migranodearena
— · 1 countries

Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 6.45 more per 100 to the recipient than Migranodearena.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Migranodearena in EUR, Teaming in GBP.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Migranodearena Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) €93.55 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 5% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 1.2% + €0.25 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 3 (9)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 3★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 3★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

£100.00 vs €93.55 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Teaming

— vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Migranodearena

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Migranodearena if

Spain-based nonprofits, companies, and individual fundraisers who want a high-reach solidarity crowdfunding marketplace with transparent, openly published fees, recurring-donation support, and Bizum, and who can accept monthly payouts.

  • Large reach: more than 4,800 NGOs raise funds through the platform.
  • Open to all creator types, including individuals, companies, collectives, and NGOs.
  • Keep-it-all model: funds are released to the cause whether or not the goal is met.
  • Transparent, openly published commission and payment-processing fees.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Migranodearena or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, Migranodearena delivers approximately €93.55 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Migranodearena operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →