givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Little Phil vs Teaming

Little Phil logo
Little Phil
Outside AU (SG/HK/US) · 1 countries

Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 2.05 more per 100 to the recipient than Little Phil.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Little Phil in AUD, Teaming in GBP.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Little Phil Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) A$97.95 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 1.75% + A$0.30 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 3 (9)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency Outside AU (SG/HK/US)
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 4★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

£100.00 vs A$97.95 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Teaming

— vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Little Phil

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Little Phil if

Australian donors, companies, and nonprofits focused on impact transparency and modern giving options such as crypto, workplace giving, and Shopify post-checkout donations, where offshore data storage is not a blocker.

  • Built-in impact-tracking so donors can see the effect of their giving first-hand.
  • Nonprofits pay no commission on donations, per Little Phil's nonprofits page.
  • Modern giving options: Apple Pay, Google Pay, cards, direct debit, internal credit, and cryptocurrency.
  • Spans donor, nonprofit, and corporate giving, including workplace-giving programmes.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Little Phil or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, Little Phil delivers approximately A$97.95 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Little Phil operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →