givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Kagnotte vs Teaming

Kagnotte logo
Kagnotte
— · 1 countries

French and EEA-based organisers running social group pots or association fundraising who want low, transparent per-contribution pricing and unlimited payouts at no extra cost, and who don't need an English-first international experience.

Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 1.25 more per 100 to the recipient than Kagnotte.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Kagnotte in EUR, Teaming in GBP.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Kagnotte Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) €98.75 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 1% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 3.9 (233)★ winner 3 (9)
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 1★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 2★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

£100.00 vs €98.75 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Kagnotte

3.9 vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Kagnotte

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Kagnotte if

French and EEA-based organisers running social group pots or association fundraising who want low, transparent per-contribution pricing and unlimited payouts at no extra cost, and who don't need an English-first international experience.

  • Low headline pricing: a small per-contribution commission plus a fixed amount, undercutting many higher-rate rivals.
  • Unlimited withdrawals to a bank account at no additional charge.
  • No subscription or setup cost to create and manage a pot.
  • Regulated fund custody via Lemonway, authorised by France's ACPR (no. 16568).
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kagnotte or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, Kagnotte delivers approximately €98.75 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Kagnotte operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →