givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-01 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

iRaiser vs Rete del Dono

iRaiser logo
iRaiser
— · 19 countries

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Rete del Dono logo
Rete del Dono
— · 1 countries

Italian registered nonprofits (ETS) and the individuals, athletes, and companies fundraising on their behalf — especially charity-sport campaigns tied to major Italian marathons and tax-deductible giving.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a £100 donation, iRaiser delivers £3.95 more to the recipient than Rete del Dono.

Fees by method · the United Kingdom

Per-method pricing vs Rete del Dono.

Payment method Per transaction Of £100, recipient gets Notes
iDEAL £99.71 Flat iDEAL fee passed through at cost; platform priced by subscription.
SEPA Direct Debit 0.35% + £0.25 £99.40 SEPA Direct Debit at cost; platform priced by subscription.
Credit card 1.9% + £0.25 £97.85 Card processing at cost; no per-donation platform fee (subscription-priced).
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric iRaiser Rete del Dono
Recipient gets (£100) £97.85★ winner £93.90
Platform fee 0%★ winner 6.1%
Payment processing fee 1.9% + £0.25★ winner 0% + £0.00
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 19 countries★ winner 1 countries
Data residency
Languages 5★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 23★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
iRaiser

£97.85 vs £93.90 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
iRaiser

19 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose iRaiser if

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

  • Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
  • Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
  • Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
  • Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.
Read full review →
Choose Rete del Dono if

Italian registered nonprofits (ETS) and the individuals, athletes, and companies fundraising on their behalf — especially charity-sport campaigns tied to major Italian marathons and tax-deductible giving.

  • Beneficiaries are always vetted registered Italian nonprofits (ETS).
  • Italian fiscal receipts with IRPEF deductions and Art Bonus support.
  • Deep charity-sport program tied to major Italian marathons.
  • Broad payment support: cards, PayPal, Stripe, Satispay, Apple Pay, Google Pay.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, iRaiser or Rete del Dono?

On a £100 donation, iRaiser delivers approximately £97.85 to the recipient and Rete del Dono delivers approximately £93.90. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

iRaiser operates in 19 countries; Rete del Dono operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →