givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-11 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

impactory vs Voor je Buurt

impactory logo
impactory
— · 1 countries

Austrian non-profit organisations and associations that want a locally compliant donation tool with automated tax-deductibility receipts and simple card or Klarna giving.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Voor je Buurt logo
Voor je Buurt
EEA · 1 countries

Dutch community groups, volunteers, and local initiatives raising money for civic, social, or green neighbourhood projects, especially those that can pair public donations with matchfunding from municipalities, provinces, or foundations.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Voor je Buurt delivers 1.00 more per 100 to the recipient than impactory.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: impactory in EUR, Voor je Buurt in GBP.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric impactory Voor je Buurt
Recipient gets (per 100) €94.00 £95.00★ winner
Platform fee 6% 5%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 1 countries 1 countries
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 2★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 6★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Voor je Buurt

£95.00 vs €94.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Tied

1 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Voor je Buurt

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose impactory if

Austrian non-profit organisations and associations that want a locally compliant donation tool with automated tax-deductibility receipts and simple card or Klarna giving.

  • Automated Austrian tax-deductibility: donation receipts downloadable as PDF or emailed for organisations with charitable status.
  • Positions itself as Austria's largest donation platform, hosting a few hundred projects from vetted non-profit organisations.
  • Organisations are screened before they can publish, adding a layer of donor trust.
  • Donors can give as a one-off guest or through a free account that tracks their cumulative giving.
Read full review →
Choose Voor je Buurt if

Dutch community groups, volunteers, and local initiatives raising money for civic, social, or green neighbourhood projects, especially those that can pair public donations with matchfunding from municipalities, provinces, or foundations.

  • Specialises in civic, social, and green neighbourhood projects across the Netherlands.
  • A single 5% service fee on payout that already covers the payment provider's transaction costs.
  • Matchfunding partnerships with funds and local governments (VSBfonds, RegioBank, provinces, and municipalities) can multiply what a campaign raises.
  • Long operating track record, with thousands of completed campaigns and a high reported success rate.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, impactory or Voor je Buurt?

Of every 100 donated, impactory delivers approximately €94.00 to the recipient and Voor je Buurt delivers approximately £95.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Voor je Buurt is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

impactory operates in 1 countries; Voor je Buurt operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →