givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-11 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

impactory vs Teaming

impactory logo
impactory
— · 1 countries

Austrian non-profit organisations and associations that want a locally compliant donation tool with automated tax-deductibility receipts and simple card or Klarna giving.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Teaming delivers 6.00 more per 100 to the recipient than impactory.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: impactory in EUR, Teaming in GBP.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric impactory Teaming
Recipient gets (per 100) €94.00 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 6% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 3 (9)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 2★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 6★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

£100.00 vs €94.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Teaming

— vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
impactory

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose impactory if

Austrian non-profit organisations and associations that want a locally compliant donation tool with automated tax-deductibility receipts and simple card or Klarna giving.

  • Automated Austrian tax-deductibility: donation receipts downloadable as PDF or emailed for organisations with charitable status.
  • Positions itself as Austria's largest donation platform, hosting a few hundred projects from vetted non-profit organisations.
  • Organisations are screened before they can publish, adding a layer of donor trust.
  • Donors can give as a one-off guest or through a free account that tracks their cumulative giving.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, impactory or Teaming?

Of every 100 donated, impactory delivers approximately €94.00 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

impactory operates in 1 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →