givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-08 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Funraisin vs Pledge

Funraisin logo
Funraisin
AU/EU/NA · 0 countries

Established nonprofits and charities running event-based, peer-to-peer, and recurring fundraising programmes that want a fully branded, white-label platform and have the capacity to operate it.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Pledge logo
Pledge
US · 1 countries

US-based individuals, nonprofits and purpose-driven companies that want a free-to-start fundraiser with a wide range of giving methods - cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, stock, donor-advised funds and crypto - plus Shopify and API-based embedded giving.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, Funraisin delivers 3.20 more per 100 to the recipient than Pledge.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Funraisin in GBP, Pledge in USD.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Funraisin Pledge
Recipient gets (per 100) £100.00★ winner $96.80
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + £0.00★ winner 2.9% + $0.30
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 0 countries 1 countries★ winner
Data residency AU/EU/NA US
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 7 10★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Funraisin

£100.00 vs $96.80 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Pledge

1 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Funraisin if

Established nonprofits and charities running event-based, peer-to-peer, and recurring fundraising programmes that want a fully branded, white-label platform and have the capacity to operate it.

  • White-label, highly customisable platform that lets nonprofits run fully branded fundraising sites.
  • Broad feature suite: donations, peer-to-peer, events and ticketing, raffles, recurring giving, and a built-in CMS.
  • Wide payment coverage including cards, PayPal, Apple Pay and Google Pay via Stripe, iDEAL, ACH, and BECS direct debit.
  • Multilingual deployments via optional language packs and support for a wide range of currencies.
Read full review →
Choose Pledge if

US-based individuals, nonprofits and purpose-driven companies that want a free-to-start fundraiser with a wide range of giving methods - cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, stock, donor-advised funds and crypto - plus Shopify and API-based embedded giving.

  • No mandatory platform fee - funded by optional donor tipping, with most donors choosing to cover the fees.
  • Exceptionally broad giving methods: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, Google Pay, stock, donor-advised funds and cryptocurrency.
  • Donations are regranted through the Pledgeling Foundation, a registered 501(c)(3) public charity, with multi-state US fundraising compliance.
  • Shopify "Give & Grow" app and embedded-giving APIs and widgets for e-commerce and product integrations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Funraisin or Pledge?

Of every 100 donated, Funraisin delivers approximately £100.00 to the recipient and Pledge delivers approximately $96.80. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Funraisin operates in 0 countries; Pledge operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →