givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Crowdfunding voor Clubs vs Donorbox

Crowdfunding voor Clubs logo
Crowdfunding voor Clubs
— · 1 countries

Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations that want to combine donation crowdfunding with bond-based club financing, and that prefer iDEAL payments with predictable per-donation or subscription pricing.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Donorbox logo
Donorbox
— · 23 countries

Small-to-medium nonprofits across verticals like churches, healthcare, education, and animal welfare that want recurring-donation tooling, donor fee-cover, and a managed donation-form product without a CRM-scale platform commitment.

The headline

Of every 100 donated, Donorbox delivers 2.35 more per 100 to the recipient than Crowdfunding voor Clubs.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Crowdfunding voor Clubs in EUR, Donorbox in GBP.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Crowdfunding voor Clubs Donorbox
Recipient gets (per 100) €92.20 £94.55★ winner
Platform fee 7.5% 2.95%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + €0.30 2.2% + £0.30★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 4 (52)★ winner
Country coverage 1 countries 23 countries★ winner
Data residency
Languages 1 12★ winner
Payment methods supported 1 19★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Donorbox

£94.55 vs €92.20 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Donorbox

— vs 4 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Donorbox

23 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Crowdfunding voor Clubs if

Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations that want to combine donation crowdfunding with bond-based club financing, and that prefer iDEAL payments with predictable per-donation or subscription pricing.

  • Purpose-built for Dutch sports clubs and cultural organisations
  • Combines donation crowdfunding with club-bond (obligatie) financing on one platform
  • Two pricing tracks: a 7.5% per-donation fee (VAT-inclusive) or a fixed annual subscription
  • iDEAL payments processed through Mollie, the standard Dutch online payment rail
Read full review →
Choose Donorbox if

Small-to-medium nonprofits across verticals like churches, healthcare, education, and animal welfare that want recurring-donation tooling, donor fee-cover, and a managed donation-form product without a CRM-scale platform commitment.

  • Donor-cover-fees option at checkout — Donorbox frames opt-in as the default, so the recipient can receive the full donation amount.
  • Broad payment-rail support: iDEAL, Bancontact, SEPA, BACS, Klarna, PayPal, Venmo, Cash App, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Amazon Pay, and Link by Stripe.
  • Standard plan has no monthly subscription — just per-transaction fees on the 2.95% / 3.95% tier.
  • First-class recurring-donation tooling with upsell prompts and donor-management features on the Pro tier.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Crowdfunding voor Clubs or Donorbox?

Of every 100 donated, Crowdfunding voor Clubs delivers approximately €92.20 to the recipient and Donorbox delivers approximately £94.55. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Crowdfunding voor Clubs operates in 1 countries; Donorbox operates in 23.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →