givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Continue to Give vs Teaming

C
Continue to Give
— · 2 countries

US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

On a £100 donation, Teaming delivers £2.95 more to the recipient than Continue to Give.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Continue to Give Teaming
Recipient gets (£100) £97.05 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 2.7% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + £0.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) 3 (9)★ winner
Country coverage 2 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 0 0
Payment methods supported 0 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

£100.00 vs £97.05 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Teaming

— vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Continue to Give

2 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Continue to Give if

US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

  • All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
  • Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
  • Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
  • Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Continue to Give or Teaming?

On a £100 donation, Continue to Give delivers approximately £97.05 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Continue to Give operates in 2 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →