givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Continue to Give vs iRaiser

C
Continue to Give
— · 2 countries

US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

No rating yet
Read full review →
iRaiser logo
iRaiser
— · 19 countries

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a £100 donation, iRaiser delivers £0.80 more to the recipient than Continue to Give.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Continue to Give iRaiser
Recipient gets (£100) £97.05 £97.85★ winner
Platform fee 2.7% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 0% + £0.00 1.9% + £0.25★ winner
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 2 countries 19 countries★ winner
Data residency
Languages 0 5★ winner
Payment methods supported 0 23★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
iRaiser

£97.85 vs £97.05 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
iRaiser

19 vs 2 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Continue to Give if

US and Canadian churches, faith-based nonprofits, and missionaries that want an all-in-one giving platform with recurring and text giving, event tools, and built-in fund accounting.

  • All-in-one toolkit: online giving, recurring and text giving, event registration, newsletters, and built-in fund accounting.
  • Explicit faith-based positioning with a pledge not to deplatform organizations over their faith.
  • Tiered plans including a no-monthly-cost Silver tier and a Gold tier with interchange-plus card rates.
  • Optional donor-covers-fees toggle so organizations can receive the full donation amount.
Read full review →
Choose iRaiser if

Established European nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions that want branded, self-hosted fundraising tools — forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, and events — under their own identity.

  • Branded, self-hosted fundraising tools (donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, events, ticketing) under the nonprofit's own identity.
  • Configurable Flex Editor for tailoring donation journeys.
  • Established European focus, reporting more than 900 charities served across the region.
  • Suited to larger nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, and cultural institutions with dedicated fundraising teams.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Continue to Give or iRaiser?

On a £100 donation, Continue to Give delivers approximately £97.05 to the recipient and iRaiser delivers approximately £97.85. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Continue to Give operates in 2 countries; iRaiser operates in 19.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →