givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Classy vs Voor je Buurt

Classy logo
Classy
US · 4 countries

Mid-to-large US nonprofits running enterprise-scale peer-to-peer campaigns, ticketed events, and recurring-giving programmes that need depth beyond a basic donation page.

No rating yet
Read full review →
Voor je Buurt logo
Voor je Buurt
EEA · 1 countries

Dutch community groups, volunteers, and local initiatives raising money for civic, social, or green neighbourhood projects, especially those that can pair public donations with matchfunding from municipalities, provinces, or foundations.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a £100 donation, Classy delivers £2.30 more to the recipient than Voor je Buurt.

Fees by method · the United Kingdom

Per-method pricing vs Voor je Buurt.

Payment method Per transaction Of £100, recipient gets Notes
Credit card 2.4% + £0.30 £97.30 GoFundMe Pay card 2.4% + $0.30; enterprise subscription quoted separately.
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Classy Voor je Buurt
Recipient gets (£100) £97.30★ winner £95.00
Platform fee 0%★ winner 5%
Payment processing fee 2.4% + £0.30★ winner 0% + £0.00
Trustpilot — (0) — (0)
Country coverage 4 countries★ winner 1 countries
Data residency US EEA★ winner
Languages 1 1
Payment methods supported 6★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Classy

£97.30 vs £95.00 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Tied

— vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Classy

4 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Voor je Buurt

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Classy if

Mid-to-large US nonprofits running enterprise-scale peer-to-peer campaigns, ticketed events, and recurring-giving programmes that need depth beyond a basic donation page.

  • Enterprise-grade peer-to-peer, events, and recurring-giving tooling.
  • Now part of GoFundMe Pro, backed by GoFundMe's reach and 190-million community.
  • Essentials plan with zero subscription fees and no setup costs for smaller nonprofits.
  • Multi-currency settlement in US dollar, Canadian dollar, pound, Australian dollar, and euro.
Read full review →
Choose Voor je Buurt if

Dutch community groups, volunteers, and local initiatives raising money for civic, social, or green neighbourhood projects, especially those that can pair public donations with matchfunding from municipalities, provinces, or foundations.

  • Specialises in civic, social, and green neighbourhood projects across the Netherlands.
  • A single 5% service fee on payout that already covers the payment provider's transaction costs.
  • Matchfunding partnerships with funds and local governments (VSBfonds, RegioBank, provinces, and municipalities) can multiply what a campaign raises.
  • Long operating track record, with thousands of completed campaigns and a high reported success rate.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Classy or Voor je Buurt?

On a £100 donation, Classy delivers approximately £97.30 to the recipient and Voor je Buurt delivers approximately £95.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Voor je Buurt is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Classy operates in 4 countries; Voor je Buurt operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →