givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Chuffed vs Teaming

Chuffed logo
Chuffed
— · 29 countries

Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

Teaming logo
Teaming
— · 0 countries

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

The headline

On a £100 donation, Teaming delivers £7.80 more to the recipient than Chuffed.

Fees by method · the United Kingdom

Per-method pricing vs Teaming.

Payment method Per transaction Of £100, recipient gets Notes
Credit card 7.8% + £0.00 £92.20 4.9% platform (VAT-inclusive ~5.9%) + ~2.9% card; EU campaigners absorb both.
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Chuffed Teaming
Recipient gets (£100) £92.20 £100.00★ winner
Platform fee 4.9% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 2.9% + £0.00 0% + £0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.8 (665)★ winner 3 (9)
Country coverage 29 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency
Languages 4★ winner 0
Payment methods supported 5★ winner 0
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Teaming

£100.00 vs £92.20 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Chuffed

4.8 vs 3 on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Chuffed

29 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Chuffed if

Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

  • Free to launch — no signup or monthly fees.
  • Optional donor-tip model can make campaigns effectively free to run.
  • Three flexible fee structures (keep-100%, shared, and flat-fee) to suit different campaigns.
  • Mission-aligned: operates as a Social Benefit Company weighing social and community impact.
Read full review →
Choose Teaming if

European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

  • Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
  • Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
  • Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
  • Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Chuffed or Teaming?

On a £100 donation, Chuffed delivers approximately £92.20 to the recipient and Teaming delivers approximately £100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Chuffed operates in 29 countries; Teaming operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →