givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Chuffed vs Supp.to

Chuffed logo
Chuffed
— · 29 countries

Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

Supp.to logo
Supp.to
NL · 2 countries

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

On a £100 donation, Supp.to delivers £7.31 more to the recipient than Chuffed.

Fees by method · the United Kingdom

Per-method pricing vs Supp.to.

Payment method Per transaction Of £100, recipient gets Notes
Credit card 7.8% + £0.00 £92.20 4.9% platform (VAT-inclusive ~5.9%) + ~2.9% card; EU campaigners absorb both.
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Chuffed Supp.to
Recipient gets (£100) £92.20 £99.51★ winner
Platform fee 4.9% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 2.9% + £0.00 0% + £0.49★ winner
Trustpilot 4.8 (665)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 29 countries★ winner 2 countries
Data residency NL
Languages 4★ winner 2
Payment methods supported 5 17★ winner
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
Supp.to

£99.51 vs £92.20 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Chuffed

4.8 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Chuffed

29 vs 2 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Chuffed if

Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

  • Free to launch — no signup or monthly fees.
  • Optional donor-tip model can make campaigns effectively free to run.
  • Three flexible fee structures (keep-100%, shared, and flat-fee) to suit different campaigns.
  • Mission-aligned: operates as a Social Benefit Company weighing social and community impact.
Read full review →
Choose Supp.to if

Dutch and Belgian individuals, groups and nonprofits that want a low, predictable per-donation fee with no percentage cut and no mandatory donor tips, plus an optional white-label or schools-focused (Sponsor.school) option.

  • Flat per-donation fee on iDEAL and Wero (EUR 0.49) rather than a percentage cut, inclusive of 21% VAT.
  • No hidden costs and no mandatory donor tip - you pay only for successful donations.
  • Payments via Mollie Payments B.V., licensed under the Wft and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank.
  • Keep-it-all funding model - funds are paid out even if the target is not reached.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Chuffed or Supp.to?

On a £100 donation, Chuffed delivers approximately £92.20 to the recipient and Supp.to delivers approximately £99.51. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Chuffed operates in 29 countries; Supp.to operates in 2.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →