givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

Chuffed vs DierenDonatie

Chuffed logo
Chuffed
— · 29 countries

Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

DierenDonatie logo
DierenDonatie
EEA · 1 countries

Dutch animal shelters, wildlife-care centres, and animal-welfare foundations that need specific goods funded - food, equipment, or veterinary care - and value a CBF-accredited, transparent donation platform.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, DierenDonatie delivers 7.80 more per 100 to the recipient than Chuffed.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: Chuffed in GBP, DierenDonatie in EUR.

Fees by method · the United Kingdom

Per-method pricing.

Payment method Per transaction Of £100, recipient gets Notes
Credit card 7.8% + £0.00 £92.20 4.9% platform (VAT-inclusive ~5.9%) + ~2.9% card; EU campaigners absorb both.
The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric Chuffed DierenDonatie
Recipient gets (per 100) £92.20 €100.00★ winner
Platform fee 4.9% 0%★ winner
Payment processing fee 2.9% + £0.00 0% + €0.00★ winner
Trustpilot 4.8 (665)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 29 countries★ winner 1 countries
Data residency EEA★ winner
Languages 4★ winner 1
Payment methods supported 5★ winner 2
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
DierenDonatie

€100.00 vs £92.20 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
Chuffed

4.8 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
Chuffed

29 vs 1 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
DierenDonatie

EEA data residency for GDPR-sensitive donor data.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose Chuffed if

Nonprofits, social enterprises, and community-cause organisers in 29 supported countries who want a 100%-free, tip-funded platform and are willing to complete identity verification before launching.

  • Free to launch — no signup or monthly fees.
  • Optional donor-tip model can make campaigns effectively free to run.
  • Three flexible fee structures (keep-100%, shared, and flat-fee) to suit different campaigns.
  • Mission-aligned: operates as a Social Benefit Company weighing social and community impact.
Read full review →
Choose DierenDonatie if

Dutch animal shelters, wildlife-care centres, and animal-welfare foundations that need specific goods funded - food, equipment, or veterinary care - and value a CBF-accredited, transparent donation platform.

  • Exclusively focused on animal-welfare causes in the Netherlands
  • Recognised as one of the first CBF-accredited donation platforms (CBF-Erkend Donatieplatform)
  • Product-fulfilment model: donors fund specific items the platform buys and ships to the foundation
  • Flat per-project contribution (EUR 10 up to EUR 300, EUR 25 above) rather than a percentage cut of donations
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Chuffed or DierenDonatie?

Of every 100 donated, Chuffed delivers approximately £92.20 to the recipient and DierenDonatie delivers approximately €100.00. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

DierenDonatie is generally better suited to European nonprofits handling GDPR-sensitive donor data because of its EEA data residency.

Which platform has more country coverage?

Chuffed operates in 29 countries; DierenDonatie operates in 1.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →