givingplatforms.com

Language & region

Pick the language you want the site in, and the country you're fundraising in or from. We use this to default the dominant payment method and currency.

Verified · 2026-06-02 Ownership disclosure
Head-to-head

4fund.com vs Alvarum

4fund.com logo
4fund.com
— · 30 countries

Individuals, charities, and small organisations across the EEA who want a multilingual, no-commission fundraiser backed by an established Polish crowdfunding operator with EU payment-institution licensing.

A
Alvarum
France · 0 countries

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

No rating yet
Read full review →
The headline

Of every 100 donated, 4fund.com delivers 2.15 more per 100 to the recipient than Alvarum.

Each platform is priced in its own currency: 4fund.com in GBP, Alvarum in EUR.

The evidence

Side-by-side.

Metric 4fund.com Alvarum
Recipient gets (per 100) £100.00★ winner €97.85
Platform fee 0% 0%
Payment processing fee 0% + £0.00★ winner 1.9% + €0.25
Trustpilot 3.9 (451)★ winner — (0)
Country coverage 30 countries★ winner 0 countries
Data residency France
Languages 30★ winner 2
Payment methods supported 12★ winner 1
Verdict

Winner by category.

Better fees
4fund.com

£100.00 vs €97.85 reaches the recipient.

Higher Trustpilot rating
4fund.com

3.9 vs — on Trustpilot.

Wider country coverage
4fund.com

30 vs 0 countries.

Better for European fundraisers
Tied

Both share the same residency posture.

Pick by fit

Choose based on who you are.

Choose 4fund.com if

Individuals, charities, and small organisations across the EEA who want a multilingual, no-commission fundraiser backed by an established Polish crowdfunding operator with EU payment-institution licensing.

  • Operated by Zrzutka.pl, the company behind Poland's long-established zrzutka.pl crowdfunding platform, with over a decade of experience.
  • Run by an operator that describes itself as an EU-licensed payment services provider supervised by Poland's financial regulator.
  • Charges organisers no commission and takes no cut on deposits or withdrawals; sustained by an optional voluntary donor contribution.
  • Broad European payment-rail support: iDEAL, Bancontact, MultiBanco, MB Way, and EPS, plus cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Revolut Pay, Skrill, N26, and ZEN.
Read full review →
Choose Alvarum if

French and European charities and associations running cause-based or sports-challenge fundraising who want donations paid directly to the beneficiary and support for European local payment methods.

  • Donations are routed directly to the beneficiary charity and settled on an automated monthly cycle rather than held by the platform.
  • Strong fit for sports-challenge and participatory event fundraising such as marathons and cycling events.
  • European local payment methods - iDEAL, Bancontact, Sofort, and SEPA direct debit - alongside Visa and Mastercard cards.
  • Payments handled by HiPay, a payment institution authorised by France's ACPR; Alvarum registered with ORIAS as a donation crowdfunding intermediary.
Read full review →
Also consider

A third option.

1%Club

Dutch and other social-impact initiators running Global-Goals-aligned campaigns who value personal coaching and community-building over a high-volume, self-serve crowdfunding marketplace.

More head-to-heads

Other comparisons.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, 4fund.com or Alvarum?

Of every 100 donated, 4fund.com delivers approximately £100.00 to the recipient and Alvarum delivers approximately €97.85. Real costs depend on the payment method donors choose.

Which is better for European nonprofits?

Both platforms operate inside the EEA framework. Choose based on local payment-method coverage and language support.

Which platform has more country coverage?

4fund.com operates in 30 countries; Alvarum operates in 0.

How we rank

Rankings are produced by a public editorial methodology — open to peer review. We disclose ownership, scoring weights, and every change.

Read methodology →