# Funraise vs Teaming

## Was die Daten sagen.

Bei Zahlung per Credit card kommen mit Teaming pro €100 rund €8.50 mehr beim Empfänger an als mit Funraise (€100.00 vs. €91.50). Bei den Kernzahlen liegen Funraise und Teaming dicht beieinander — die bessere Wahl hängt von der SEPA Direct Debit-Verfügbarkeit, der Sprachabdeckung und dem Sitz deiner Spender ab.

## Nebeneinander.

| Kennzahl | Funraise | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Empfänger bekommt | €91.50 | €100.00 |
| Plattformgebühr | 5% | 0% |
| Gebühr für die Zahlungsabwicklung | 2.9% + €0.60 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 79 | 80 |
| Länderabdeckung | 0 | 0 |
| Datenstandort | US | — |
| Sprachen | 0 | 0 |
| Unterstützte Zahlungsarten | 5 | 0 |

## Nimm Funraise, wenn

> Small and mid-size US nonprofits, especially those under about a million dollars in revenue, that want donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, and a donor CRM in one connected platform.

- All-in-one suite: donation forms, recurring giving, peer-to-peer, events, auctions, and donor CRM.
- Unusually broad donor payment options: cards, ACH, PayPal, Venmo, Apple Pay, DAFpay, stock, and crypto.
- Built by nonprofit veterans, with workflows tuned to sector needs.
- Optional donor cost-coverage so organizations keep more of each donation.


## Nimm Teaming, wenn

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.

