# Big Give vs Teaming

## Was die Daten sagen.

Bei den Kernzahlen liegen Big Give und Teaming dicht beieinander — die bessere Wahl hängt von der SEPA Direct Debit-Verfügbarkeit, der Sprachabdeckung und dem Sitz deiner Spender ab.

## Nebeneinander.

| Kennzahl | Big Give | Teaming |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Empfänger bekommt | £100.00 | €100.00 |
| Plattformgebühr | 0% | 0% |
| Gebühr für die Zahlungsabwicklung | 0% + £0.00 | 0% + €0.00 |
| Trustpilot | — (0) | 2.8 (10) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 77 | 80 |
| Länderabdeckung | 1 | 0 |
| Datenstandort | UK | — |
| Sprachen | 1 | 0 |
| Unterstützte Zahlungsarten | 4 | 0 |

## Nimm Big Give, wenn

> UK-registered charities running time-limited appeals that can secure pledges and Champion match funding to double public donations during a campaign window.

- Match-funding model can effectively double donations during a campaign.
- Operated by a registered UK charity, aligned with the sector it serves.
- Well-established, with the flagship Christmas Challenge running since 2008.
- Connects charities with major donors and Champion funders who provide match funding.


## Nimm Teaming, wenn

> European supporters and small NGOs that prefer steady, low-commitment recurring giving - one euro a month per cause through a Teaming Group - over one-off donation campaigns.

- Simple, recurring one-euro-a-month microdonation model that gives causes predictable monthly income.
- Run by the nonprofit Teaming Foundation, which funds platform operations through trustees, partner companies and pro-bono support.
- Collective "Teaming Groups" let companies and communities pool many small contributions behind one cause.
- Recurring-by-design, supporting long-term sustainability for grassroots organizations.