# BetterWorld vs PIFworld

## Was die Daten sagen.

Bei Zahlung per Credit card kommen mit BetterWorld pro €100 rund €3.20 mehr beim Empfänger an als mit PIFworld (€96.80 vs. €93.60). Bei den Kernzahlen liegen BetterWorld und PIFworld dicht beieinander — die bessere Wahl hängt von der SEPA Direct Debit-Verfügbarkeit, der Sprachabdeckung und dem Sitz deiner Spender ab.

## Nebeneinander.

| Kennzahl | BetterWorld | PIFworld |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Empfänger bekommt | €96.80 | €93.60 |
| Plattformgebühr | 0% | 6.05% |
| Gebühr für die Zahlungsabwicklung | 2.9% + €0.30 | 0% + €0.35 |
| Trustpilot | 2.9 (2) | — (0) |
| Domain Rating (by Ahrefs — https://ahrefs.com/) | 81 | 56 |
| Länderabdeckung | 0 | 1 |
| Datenstandort | — | — |
| Sprachen | 1 | 2 |
| Unterstützte Zahlungsarten | 5 | 0 |

## Nimm BetterWorld, wenn

> Nonprofits, schools, PTOs, and community groups in the US running auctions, raffles, events, and peer-to-peer campaigns that want every fundraising tool available on every plan.

- Exceptionally broad format support: silent and live auctions, raffles, events, donation forms, peer-to-peer, crowdfunding, paddle raise, and a-thons.
- No feature gating - every fundraising tool is available even on the free entry plan.
- Paid Partner ($1,550/year) and Keystone ($5,950/year) tiers lower the platform's percentage cut for higher-volume organizations.
- Most donors (over 95%) opt to cover payment processing, so organizations retain more of each gift.


## Nimm PIFworld, wenn

> Dutch nonprofits and companies running social-impact and employee-giving campaigns, plus individuals who want to fundraise for projects rather than simply make a one-off donation.

- Combines personal fundraising with structured corporate and employee-giving programmes.
- Connects individuals, nonprofits, and companies on a single platform.
- Participation-led model: supporters can donate, fundraise, or spread a project's message.
- Dutch and English interface for a Netherlands and European audience.